President Obama: “Thou Need Not Bow”
President Obama, “thou need not bow!”
On Saturday, President Obama bowed—at nearly a 90-degree angle—while shaking hands with Japanese Emperor Akihito.
While not violating any “official” protocol, the elected leader of the United States of America bowed to a foreign head-of-state.
Many have called the bow obsequious and an act of fealty.
One blogger said the act was “treasonous.” Another blogger asked, “How Low Will He Go?” And a third blogger exclaimed, “She’s barely 18!” (I got bored researching this story and click on an old bookmark).
Protocol dictates that leaders not bow to one another. Pamela Eyring, president of The Protocol School of Washington, says there are no written rules against bows, but they are not appropriate when national leaders meet.
“They’re peers,” explained Eyring. “Unfortunately, it isn’t correct for a chief of state to bow to another chief of state. It’s not appropriate. He should not be bowing to other chiefs of state.”
She went on to say that the Emperor and his wife seemed a “bit uncomfortable” by Obama’s bow (so did the Founding Fathers, Uncle Sam, and all the brave men and women who ever served in a branch of the U.S. armed forces).
“When you’re representing the United States of America, everything speaks … on behalf of our country,” noted Eyring. “It’s a visual. It shows more of a subservient look.”
There’s an old State Department saying that goes, “thou need not bow.” There’s also one about a “dead hooker” and a “live boy” but the exact wording eludes us.
Furthermore, even average Americans don’t have to bow to heads of state (average Americans only have to bow to Oprah).
Twenty years ago, Miss Manners wrote, “One does not bow or curtsy to a foreign monarch because the gesture symbolizes recognition of her power over her subjects.”
And Americans aren’t subjects.
Remember all the Americans that died and fought in world wars last century? Remember all the Americans fighting and dying in wars this century? They aren’t making the ultimate sacrifice so we can bow to foreigners. They are making the ultimate sacrifice so we’ll never have to bow to anyone.
This isn’t the first time Obama has dipped-at-the hip for a foreign leader. He bowed to King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia in April (the White House claimed it was not a bow but the President reacting to a bad burrito).
This time the White House isn’t even bothering with the spin. An official from the Obama administration explained that the bow was protocol and it “enhanced both the position and the status of the U.S. relative to Japan.”
Maybe it did. Maybe a bow is just a bow. Certainly a lot of Americans will see the President bending over as nothing more than culture sensitivity.
However, actions have meanings. And for some Americans, the President’s bow didn’t show respect to his Japanese hosts, but showed disrespect to his country and constituents.

10:06 am
A lot of Conservatives are having a field day over this photo and I can understand where they are coming from. The point is that Obama is about as politically correct as they come, and he constantly feels the need to respect and honor other cultures when visiting. It does not suprise me that the same guy who once sported a turban to honor Kenya culture would bow to a Japanese Emperor. I have mixed feelings on the subject, but I’m really surprised people are in shock and horror over the incident.
[Reply]
Mayonaze Reply:
November 17th, 2009 at 11:00 am
ReynsGems,
I understand what you’re saying. I just associate “bowing” with subserviency. I think “bowing” is generally a bad thing. Some say it’s just a gesture, but I would say it’s a gesture with meaning.
In 1936, at the Berlin Olympics, nations dipped, or bowed, their flag when they marched by the Fuhrer in the opening ceremony. The United States kept their flag erect. I expect my President to continue that tradition of bowing to no one.
[Reply]
ReynsGems Reply:
November 17th, 2009 at 11:37 am
I totally agree with what you are saying there. I think two equal national leaders should greet each other equally. If Obama bows then the Japanese Emperor bows (or vice versa), then I guess they are bowing equally – although some may say the first to bow is the inferior.
Obviously there is a ton of ways to analyze this situation and is a direct result of 24/7 political news which often does not have anything better to gripe about.
I do not know a lot about Japanese culture but I assume bowing is as common as a handshake in America. Whether or not our President should greet the emperor in that matter is a whole other subject.
[Reply]